NOW do you see our point?
It's not that
you are a woman, California does this to everybody
http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/035GZS - NOW do you see our point.html
|
|
NOW do you see our point? It's not that
you are a woman, California does this to everybody |
Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 07-01-02
The National Organization for Women (NOW) is finally catching on in a very big way. The "out of control" California family law "money machine" has started to deny custody to women. The California NOW Family Law Taskforce has proposed a Legislative, Judicial, Executive, and Grassroots strategy to reform the Family Law Courts.
Renewing their pledge to seek equality, this crack team of humanitarians, are responding to family law injustice that seems to be targeting a few women who got pregnant in the state of California. This outrage is well justified and shared by all California family members, but NOW's angst seems to revolve around women.
The newly released "Family Court Report (FCR)" published by the California contingent of NOW would easily gain universal backing if the word "woman" was replaced with "noncustodial parent" throughout the report.
The FCR exudes the typical family law rhetoric and attempts to "drive home" these presumptions, myths, and legends with a preponderance of rhetorical sources and seems to be based on 300 examples of hearsay evidence. There are 14 million custodial parents in the United States and only 15% (2.1 million) are men. Hearsay testimony from 0.014% (300 / 2.1 million) angry noncustodial women is not enough to prove gender-bias. Of the 373 questions that were included in the extensive questionnaire, that is used as a basis for much of the gender bias conclusions in the FCR, only 4 would be sufficient to prove corruption within the California family law system.
A. Personal Information
15. How many children under age 18 are there from this relationship?
C. Children’s Personal Information
6. Amount of monthly support order?
D. Property Division and Spousal Support
4. Your current monthly income?
8. Former husband/partner current monthly income?
If the 300 angry women had a comparable income as their former husband / partner, then the root of the problem would become blatantly clear. The family law system in California is only designed to guarantee a cash flow between parents, regardless of sex, race, class, culture, ethnicity, or sexual orientation?
The FCR makes many interesting claims:
NOW was responsible for starting the father's right movement by advancing the women's movement with the Family Law Act.
The father's rights movement has a sinister agenda in trying to challenge the rights of mothers in an attempt to evade paying child support.
The Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is a farce and is being used by fathers attempting to evade paying child support.
Women who are victims of domestic violence, whose children make allegations of abuse against their fathers, are particularly at risk of losing custody of their children to the perpetrator.
The FCR should have made the following claims:
California uses unwed mothers as a tool to guarantee a cash flow into the state family law "money machine", which has provoked "misdirected anguish" by NCPs attempting to disarm the state.
21% of all female homicide victims were killed by their spouse in California \1
43% of all female homicide victims were killed by a family member in California \1.
41% of all child homicide victims were killed a family member in California \1.
The feminists from Indiana (Institute of Family and Social Responsibility) have provided fraudulent data regarding California's child support guideline to the US House, denying Legislative visibility into the highest child support guideline in the nation \2.
California paid an undisclosed amount to profiteers from Colorado (Policy Studies Inc.) to "subvert the federal law" for the Judicial Council in San Francisco prior to 9/11/01. \3
California paid $250,000 to profiteers from Colorado (Policy Studies Inc.) to "cook the books" for the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) in Los Angeles prior to 9/11/01. \4
California led the nation, reporting 35,000 paternity establishments over and above out-of-wedlock births in 1995 - 1998. \5
California led the nation, making a $189 million profit in 1998 regarding Child Support Enforcement (CSE). \6
California led the nation, transferring $307 million into the Child Care and Development fund (CCDF) in 1999 regarding Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). \7
Jim Untershine, 824 E Pass Rd #3, Gulfport, MS 39507, gzs@gndzerosrv.com, www.gndzerosrv.com
Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.